How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

So, how does that affect the Athanasian Christian doctrine of the Trinity?

The New Testament identifies Jesus. Literally, spelling it out in Acts 3.

Later, Tertullian would lay the foundations of the Trinity.

How long can someone with narcissistic tendencies maintain a facade of fake love before their true self is revealed? Is there a specific trigger or amount of time that causes them to reveal their true nature?

For example, Jesus has a God …

A Trinity was first mentioned as G-d, His Word and His Wisdom, by Theophilus of Antioch.

Considering that the traditions stem from interpretations based off the writings, sola scriptura would be the means to test the coherency of the traditions.

Do you even realise that NASA could've hid or bury every single piece of evidence for a flat-earth and exaggerate their evidence? Have you ever question materialist scientific narratives?

But if you read it through the filter of the traditions of a Trinity, you will miss it (like many miss Jesus telling Mary about Mary’s G-d being Jesus’s G-d). That is incoherent.

But it was not until the efforts to create a uniform Christianity at Nicaea that the concept became the accepted tradition, to create a universal (catholic) interpretation of the writings.

Nuda scriptura is scripture alone. Sola scriptura looks at the writings and the traditions, with the writings (source of the traditions) having greater relevance.

How do military families handle communication when a service member is injured overseas?

John 20:17] Jesus said to her, “Do not cling to Me, for I have not yet ascended to My Father; but go to My brethren and say to them, ‘I am ascending to My Father and your Father, and to My God and your God.’ ”

How is Sola Scriptura incoherent?

Read also: